Economics, Entrepreneurship, Management

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Editorial Policies
  • Submissions
  • Archives
  • Indexing
  • Contact Info
uk

Economics, Entrepreneurship, Management

  • Submit an article
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Article

Cooperation between travel agencies and tour operators in the organisation of heritage and cultural tourism trips in the European Union countries

Oleh Karyy Ihor Kulyniak Solomiya Ohinok Yuliia Bondarenko
Abstract

This study aimed to develop a cluster-based structure of the tourism market and to identify trends in the development of the tourism sector by assessing the productivity of travel agencies and tour operators in the European Union and Ukraine in the context of organising international and domestic heritage and cultural tourism trips. The analysis employed a range of methods, including cluster analysis, statistical techniques, data standardisation, a matrix-based approach, and comparative analysis. To evaluate the productivity of tourism enterprises, the following indicators were calculated: value added per enterprise, turnover per enterprise, value added per employee, and turnover per employee. The application of hierarchical clustering enabled the classification of countries into three groups based on the productivity levels of travel agencies and tour operators: high, medium, and low. Ukraine was placed in the group with low productivity for both travel agencies and tour operators. The findings revealed that most EU countries demonstrate stable productivity in both categories of tourism enterprises, indicating a consistent level of tourism market development. However, some countries exhibit discrepancies between the productivity levels of travel agencies and tour operators. These differences can be attributed to specific market conditions, business strategies, and the underlying economic model of tourism. To determine whether travel agencies and tour operators are primarily focused on organising domestic or international tourism trips, and to evaluate their effectiveness in these areas, an indicator reflecting the ratio of organised domestic to international tourism trips is proposed. Using a matrix approach, which cross-references the productivity level of tourism enterprises with the direction of tourism flows, EU countries were clustered according to similarities in their performance in organising heritage and cultural tourism trips. The results of the grouping suggest that domestic tourism is a key factor contributing to the high productivity of tourism enterprises in leading EU countries. The findings may inform the development of strategies aimed at improving the efficiency of tourism enterprises, including through optimising business models, attracting international tourists, and enhancing the organisation of domestic tourism trips

Keywords

tourism enterprise; historical and cultural heritage; efficiency; productivity; tourism market; international and domestic tourism

Download article

Received 30.01.2025, Revised 24.04.2025, Accepted 05.06.2025

Retrieved from Vol. 12, No. 1, 2025

Suggested citation

Karyy, O., Kulyniak, I., Ohinok, S., & Bondarenko, Yu. (2025). Cooperation between travel agencies and tour operators in the organisation of heritage and cultural tourism trips in the European Union countries. Economics, Entrepreneurship, Management, 12(1), 20-32. https://doi.org/10.56318/eem2025.01.020

https://doi.org/10.56318/eem2025.01.020

Pages 20-32

References

  1. Advantage Austria. (n.d.). Outbound tourism to Austria. Overview. Retrieved from https://www.advantageaustria.org/ua/zentral/branchen/tourismus-nach-oesterreich/overview/Ueberblick.en.html.
  2. Astike, K., Borges, A.P., Skvarciany, V., & Vieira, E. (2024). Do cultural activities and happiness matter to the tourism sector? Economics and Culture, 21(1), 93-104. doi: 10.2478/jec-2024-0007.
  3. Coelho, A., & Castillo-Girón, V.M. (2020). The medium of exchange in mergers and acquisitions: The cases of travel agencies and tour operators. Administrative Sciences, 10(4), article number 97. doi: 10.3390/admsci10040097.
  4. Eurostat. (2025a). Enterprises by detailed NACE Rev. 2 activity and special aggregates. doi: 10.2908/SBS_OVW_ACT.
  5. Eurostat. (2025b). Trips by duration, purpose, and leading destination. doi: 10.2908/TOUR_DEM_TTTOT.
  6. Falk, M.T., Hagsten, E., Lin, X. (2022). Domestic tourism demand in the North and the South of Europe in the Covid-19 summer of 2020. The Annals of Regional Science, 69(2), 537-553. doi: 10.1007/s00168-022-01147-5.
  7. Franczak, I., & Bakota, D. (2024). Tourism business management regarding earnings management by travel agencies during disease threats – evidence from Poland. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 25(4), 774-788. doi: 10.3846/jbem.2024.22029.
  8. Grigorescu, A., Lincaru, C., Pirciog, S., & Chitescu, R.-I. (2021). Mapping post-crisis European job growth in travel agencies and tour operator reservation services. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 34(1), 2906-2934. doi: 10.1080/1331677X.2020.1860110.
  9. Gunter, U., Smeral, E., & Zekan, B. (2024). Forecasting tourism in the EU after the COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, 48(5), 909-919. doi: 10.1177/10963480221125130.
  10. Harb, G., & Bassil, C. (2022). Regional growth, domestic and foreign tourism in NUTS regions: New insights from the old continent. Journal of Travel Research, 61(2), 279-298. doi: 10.1177/0047287520979673.
  11. Ion, R.A., & Petre, I.L. (2024). Influence analysis of different factors from the tourism sector on rural gross value added: Cross-section analysis at the EU level. Sustainability, 16(20), article number 8997. doi: 10.3390/su16208997.
  12. Kozlowski, A.R. (2023). The war and tourism: Security issues and business opportunities in the shadow of the Russian war against Ukraine. Quality and Quantity. doi: 10.1007/s11135-023-01762-0.
  13. Kutlu, D., Zanbak, M., Soycan, S., Kasalak, M.A., & Aktaş Çimen, Z. (2024). The influence of world heritage sites on tourism dynamics in the EU 27 nations. Sustainability, 16(20), article number 9090. doi: 10.3390/su16209090.
  14. Malatinec, T. (2024). European Union legal framework of state aid in cultural tourism and the use of notified aid by member states. Juridical Tribune – Review of Comparative and International Law, 14(4), 620-635. doi: 10.62768/TBJ/2024/14/4/06.
  15. Nikas, I.A. (2024). Spatial analysis of tourist routes offered by travel agencies and some overtourism issues: The case of Crete. In V. Katsoni & G. Cassar (Eds.), Recent advancements in tourism business, technology and social sciences (IACuDiT 2023) (pp. 623-638). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-54338-8_36.
  16. Olshanska, O., Puzyrova, P., & Shevchenko, I. (2023). The tourist industry of Ukraine in the post-war period: Key directions of recovery and factors of influence in the European vector of development. Journal of Strategic Economic Research, 24(6), 99-107. doi: 10.30857/2786-5398.2023.6.10.
  17. Rodríguez, P., & García, J.S. (2022). Use of influencers in the Spanish tourism companies’ digital marketing. Cuadernos.Info, 51, 200-222. doi: 10.7764/cdi.51.27743.
  18. Sánchez-Dávila, E., & García, L.Y. (2025). Does the origin of tourism matter for poverty reduction? Evidence from Peruvian’s department, 2003-2022. Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events, 1-18. doi: 10.1080/19407963.2024.2448447.
  19. Sardi, A., Rizzi, A., & Sorano, E. (2025). Economic impact analysis of mega events for sustainable tourism: Insights from the Giro d’Italia and Tour de France. Administrative Sciences, 15(2), article number 35. doi: 10.3390/admsci15020035.
  20. Shpak, N., Kulyniak, I., Novakivskyi, I., & Oleksiv, I. (2023). Clusterization in tourism development level’s assessment of regions: Example of Ukraine. Journal of Tourism and Services, 14(26), 45-56. doi: 10.29036/jots.v14i26.444.
  21. State Statistics Committee of Ukraine. (2010). Classification of types of economic activity. DK 009:2010. Kyiv: State Consumer Standard of Ukraine.
  22. Tarkang, M.E., Adedoyin, F.F., & Bekun, F.V. (2023). an investigation into the role of tourism growth, conventional energy consumption, and real income on ecological footprint nexus in France. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 12(1), 46-54. doi: 10.14710/ijred.2023.43246.
  23. Tomej, K., & Bilynets, I. (2024). Large-scale tourism transformations through regeneration: A living systems perspective on tourism developments in Ukraine during the war. Annals of Tourism Research, 109, article number 103856. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2024.103856.
  24. Veríssimo, I., & Costa, R. (2021). Risk management in travel agencies and tour operators in Portugal. Journal of Tourism and Development, 36(2), 91-100. doi: 10.34624/rtd.v36i2.26013.
  25. Zaninović, V., & Host, A. (2021). Determinants of operating revenues: Travel agencies vs tour operators in the European Union. In G. Karanovic, P. Polychronidou, A. Karasavvoglou & H. Maskarin Ribaric (Eds.), Tourism management and sustainable development. Contributions to economics (pp. 63-69). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-74632-2_5.
ISSN 2312-3435 e-ISSN 2413-7634
DOI: 10.56318/eem